Skip to main content

Consuming Microsoft .NET SOAP server datasets in PHP

Microsoft Just Clowning Around Again
If you're impatient here is the link that this article leads to

SOAP is generally understood to be a simple method for systems to exchange data in a standard manner. This allows for remote systems to make calls on a server application. This sounds like a Good Idea.

Microsoft, however, does not appear to fully understand the concept of SOAP when it comes to providing a SOAP server based on "datasets".

Apparently the use of these datasets make it much easier for programmers using Microsoft languages to consume web services. 
Unfortunately it makes it inconvenient for everybody else.

So we have a standard way of doing things, but Microsoft decides to "improve" it and thereby forces everybody else to manually parse their XML responses. What is the point of having a standard method of accessing server methods if Microsoft then makes their implementation inoperable to Java, PHP, Ruby, Python, developers? 

Isn't the whole idea of SOAP to allow remote access?  So why make things difficult for everybody except the people who choose Microsoft as their vendor for Server, Desktop, Development IDE, Programming Language, Email, and Security?  What about somebody who wants to use a vendor other than Microsoft for one of these software services?  Is it technically better?  Is it better for a client to be locked into a vendor?  Or does Microsoft make more money by trying to force you to make them your vendor for all software?

Well in any case, if you are trying to consume a Microsoft dataset SOAP packet you will end up needing to write your own helper classes to decipher their code.  That's the bad news.  Trust me, I asked on Stackoverflow, Googled extensively (I didn't use Bing to search though, maybe I should have), and otherwise checked and rechecked why I was not able to handle the SOAP packets being returned by the Microsoft server.

PHP developers can use this code (http://www.bin-co.com/php/scripts/xml2array/) as a start to developing their class.  The code given there will help shortcut the process of reading the Microsoft dataset SOAP response.  If anybody has similar solutions for other languages please feel free to forward them to me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Fail2Ban to protect a Varnished site from scrapers

I'm using Varnish to cache a fairly busy property site.  Varnish works like a bomb for normal users and has greatly improved our page load speed. For bots that are scraping the site, presumably to add the property listings to their own site, though the cache is next to useless since the bots are sequentially trawling through the whole site. I decided to use fail2ban to block IP's who hit the site too often. The first step in doing so was to enable a disk based access log for Varnish so that fail2ban will have something to work with. This means setting up varnishncsa.  Add this to your /etc/rc.local file: varnishncsa -a -w /var/log/varnish/access.log -D -P /var/run/varnishncsa.pid This starts up varnishncsa in daemon mode and appends Varnish access attempts to /var/log/varnish/access.log Now edit or create /etc/logrotate.d/varnish and make an entry to rotate this access log: /var/log/varnish/*log { create 640 http log compress ...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Separating business logic from persistence layer in Laravel

There are several reasons to separate business logic from your persistence layer.  Perhaps the biggest advantage is that the parts of your application which are unique are not coupled to how data are persisted.  This makes the code easier to port and maintain. I'm going to use Doctrine to replace the Eloquent ORM in Laravel.  A thorough comparison of the patterns is available  here . By using Doctrine I am also hoping to mitigate the risk of a major version upgrade on the underlying framework.  It can be expected for the ORM to change between major versions of a framework and upgrading to a new release can be quite costly. Another advantage to this approach is to limit the access that objects have to the database.  Unless a developer is aware of the business rules in place on an Eloquent model there is a chance they will mistakenly ignore them by calling the ActiveRecord save method directly. I'm not implementing the repository pattern in all its ...