Skip to main content

Installing phpMyAdmin and removing the popup authentication in CentOS 6

Installing phpMyAdmin is a snip in CentOS, but there is a little trick that most tutorials skip out. For some reason the default setup (using standard repositories) does not like you having a null password for your mySQL root account. I know that you are supposed to be able to set a blank password in the pma config file and set the option to allow blank passwords to true, but this did not work for me until I set a root password. I kept getting a popup box that looked exactly like a .htaccess Apache protect but was actually just a Javascript prompt.
So here goes:


Step One - enable your EPEL repo:



 $ cd /tmp  
 $ wget http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-7.noarch.rpm  
 # rpm -ivh epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm  


Step Two - Install phpMyAdmin

 # yum search phpmyadmin  
 # yum -y install phpmyadmin  


Step Three - optionally edit your Apache conf

If you get Apache forbidden errors (should not be the case) you can try editing your .conf file
 # vi /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpMyAdmin.conf  


So that it looks like this:

 <Directory /usr/share/phpMyAdmin/>  
   Order Allow,Deny  
   Allow from All  
 </Directory>  


Remember to restart Apache afterwards

Step Four - Set a mySQL root password

 $ mysqladmin -u root password "hackme"  


Step Five - Edit your config.inc.php file

You should be able to navigate to http://localhost/phpmyadmin/setup and use that to create your config file, but I rather copied the sample to a new file.

Your /usr/share/phpMyAdmin/config.inc.php file should include the following:

 /* Authentication type */  
 $cfg['Servers'][$i]['auth_type'] = 'config';  
 $cfg['Servers'][$i]['user'] = 'root';  
 $cfg['Servers'][$i]['password'] = 'hackme';  
 $cfg['Servers'][$i]['AllowRoot'] = true;  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Solving Doctrine - A new entity was found through the relationship

There are so many different problems that people have with the Doctrine error message: exception 'Doctrine\ORM\ORMInvalidArgumentException' with message 'A new entity was found through the relationship 'App\Lib\Domain\Datalayer\UnicodeLookups#lookupStatus' that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Searching through the various online sources was a bit of a nightmare.  The best documentation I found was at  http://www.krueckeberg.org/  where there were a number of clearly explained examples of various associations. More useful information about association ownership was in the Doctrine manual , but I found a more succinct explanation in the answer to this question on StackOverflow . Now I understood better about associations and ownership and was able to identify exactly what sort I was using and the syntax that was required. I was implementing a uni-directional many to one relationship, which is supposedly one of the most simpl...

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it.    I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on.  A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...