Skip to main content

Server sent events in PHP

Server sent events are really pretty cool.  They let your application function a little bit more like an application and a little less than a click adventure in the web wonderland.  They are very simple to code and allow your backend code to notify your frontend of progress or other changes.
I could get into trouble for this class comment

At time of writing they are not supported by Internet Explorer ( see here ) but hopefully Microsoft will either stop making Internet Explorer or bring it up to speed with modern browsers.  Yeah I know that's not going to happen, but we can wish right?

You don't need to retain an open connection for every visitor to your site because browsers will reopen a closed connection after a few seconds.  The additional load for implementing SSE seems to be manageable according to people like this guy who have done tests.

My first project implementing them was for a database consistency tool that is intended to be run against the database in off-peak times to verify that things are as we expect them to be.  Basically I wanted a tool to check for dirty data, but more importantly to audit the financial transactions occurring on our site.  I wanted to play with SSE so implemented them as a notification service.  As the program runs through the various batches of tests it spits out information to the frontend about what it's busy with, if it found an error, and other interesting snippets.

There are bunches of tutorials available on them out there so I'm not going to paste code.

One thing that did concern me a bit is the possibility of forged messages.  It's pretty simple to check the origin of incoming messages against a whitelist of domains.  Here is an example from html5rocks.com that has a simple origin validation:

 source.addEventListener('message', function(e) {  
  if (e.origin != 'http://example.com') {  
   alert('Origin was not http://example.com');  
   return;  
  }  
  ...  
 }, false);

Personally I think SSE should be in the toolkit of any web application developer.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using Fail2Ban to protect a Varnished site from scrapers

I'm using Varnish to cache a fairly busy property site.  Varnish works like a bomb for normal users and has greatly improved our page load speed. For bots that are scraping the site, presumably to add the property listings to their own site, though the cache is next to useless since the bots are sequentially trawling through the whole site. I decided to use fail2ban to block IP's who hit the site too often. The first step in doing so was to enable a disk based access log for Varnish so that fail2ban will have something to work with. This means setting up varnishncsa.  Add this to your /etc/rc.local file: varnishncsa -a -w /var/log/varnish/access.log -D -P /var/run/varnishncsa.pid This starts up varnishncsa in daemon mode and appends Varnish access attempts to /var/log/varnish/access.log Now edit or create /etc/logrotate.d/varnish and make an entry to rotate this access log: /var/log/varnish/*log { create 640 http log compress ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...
Post a Comment
Read more

Separating business logic from persistence layer in Laravel

There are several reasons to separate business logic from your persistence layer.  Perhaps the biggest advantage is that the parts of your application which are unique are not coupled to how data are persisted.  This makes the code easier to port and maintain. I'm going to use Doctrine to replace the Eloquent ORM in Laravel.  A thorough comparison of the patterns is available  here . By using Doctrine I am also hoping to mitigate the risk of a major version upgrade on the underlying framework.  It can be expected for the ORM to change between major versions of a framework and upgrading to a new release can be quite costly. Another advantage to this approach is to limit the access that objects have to the database.  Unless a developer is aware of the business rules in place on an Eloquent model there is a chance they will mistakenly ignore them by calling the ActiveRecord save method directly. I'm not implementing the repository pattern in all its ...
Post a Comment
Read more