Skip to main content

Compressing Apache output with mod_deflate on Centos

Apache on Centos ships with mod_deflate installed and enabled by default.  To check this you can grep your config file and make sure the line which loads it is not commented out.

 cat /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf | grep LoadModule deflate_module  

When Apache loads it reads all the config files (ending in .conf) in /etc/httpd/conf.d so we'll add configuration options for mod_deflate into this directory. Lets use a file called deflate.conf to specify the config:

 <IfModule mod_deflate.c>  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/plain  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/javascript  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE image/svg+xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE image/x-icon  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xhtml+xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/rss+xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/javascript  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/x-javascript  
  DeflateCompressionLevel 9  
 # Browser specific settings  
  BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html  
  BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip  
  BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html  
  BrowserMatch \bOpera !no-gzip   
 </IfModule>  

You can check it is working by noticing your YSlow report now shows, by using an online tool, or by just checking the headers with Chrome or Firefox's developer tools.

If you're using Varnish and Apache does not have mod_deflate then you can enable gzip in your vcl as per the Varnish manual.  The page linked at the bottom of the Varnish manual ( How GZIP, and GZIP+ESI works in Varnish ) explains how the response from the backend is stored in a compressed state.

  sub vcl_fetch {  
    if (beresp.http.content-type ~ "text") {  
        set beresp.do_gzip = true;  
    }  
 }  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using Fail2Ban to protect a Varnished site from scrapers

I'm using Varnish to cache a fairly busy property site.  Varnish works like a bomb for normal users and has greatly improved our page load speed. For bots that are scraping the site, presumably to add the property listings to their own site, though the cache is next to useless since the bots are sequentially trawling through the whole site. I decided to use fail2ban to block IP's who hit the site too often. The first step in doing so was to enable a disk based access log for Varnish so that fail2ban will have something to work with. This means setting up varnishncsa.  Add this to your /etc/rc.local file: varnishncsa -a -w /var/log/varnish/access.log -D -P /var/run/varnishncsa.pid This starts up varnishncsa in daemon mode and appends Varnish access attempts to /var/log/varnish/access.log Now edit or create /etc/logrotate.d/varnish and make an entry to rotate this access log: /var/log/varnish/*log { create 640 http log compress ...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Separating business logic from persistence layer in Laravel

There are several reasons to separate business logic from your persistence layer.  Perhaps the biggest advantage is that the parts of your application which are unique are not coupled to how data are persisted.  This makes the code easier to port and maintain. I'm going to use Doctrine to replace the Eloquent ORM in Laravel.  A thorough comparison of the patterns is available  here . By using Doctrine I am also hoping to mitigate the risk of a major version upgrade on the underlying framework.  It can be expected for the ORM to change between major versions of a framework and upgrading to a new release can be quite costly. Another advantage to this approach is to limit the access that objects have to the database.  Unless a developer is aware of the business rules in place on an Eloquent model there is a chance they will mistakenly ignore them by calling the ActiveRecord save method directly. I'm not implementing the repository pattern in all its ...