Skip to main content

Compressing Apache output with mod_deflate on Centos

Apache on Centos ships with mod_deflate installed and enabled by default.  To check this you can grep your config file and make sure the line which loads it is not commented out.

 cat /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf | grep LoadModule deflate_module  

When Apache loads it reads all the config files (ending in .conf) in /etc/httpd/conf.d so we'll add configuration options for mod_deflate into this directory. Lets use a file called deflate.conf to specify the config:

 <IfModule mod_deflate.c>  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/plain  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/javascript  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE image/svg+xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE image/x-icon  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xhtml+xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/rss+xml  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/javascript  
  AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/x-javascript  
  DeflateCompressionLevel 9  
 # Browser specific settings  
  BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4 gzip-only-text/html  
  BrowserMatch ^Mozilla/4\.0[678] no-gzip  
  BrowserMatch \bMSIE !no-gzip !gzip-only-text/html  
  BrowserMatch \bOpera !no-gzip   
 </IfModule>  

You can check it is working by noticing your YSlow report now shows, by using an online tool, or by just checking the headers with Chrome or Firefox's developer tools.

If you're using Varnish and Apache does not have mod_deflate then you can enable gzip in your vcl as per the Varnish manual.  The page linked at the bottom of the Varnish manual ( How GZIP, and GZIP+ESI works in Varnish ) explains how the response from the backend is stored in a compressed state.

  sub vcl_fetch {  
    if (beresp.http.content-type ~ "text") {  
        set beresp.do_gzip = true;  
    }  
 }  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Solving Doctrine - A new entity was found through the relationship

There are so many different problems that people have with the Doctrine error message: exception 'Doctrine\ORM\ORMInvalidArgumentException' with message 'A new entity was found through the relationship 'App\Lib\Domain\Datalayer\UnicodeLookups#lookupStatus' that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Searching through the various online sources was a bit of a nightmare.  The best documentation I found was at  http://www.krueckeberg.org/  where there were a number of clearly explained examples of various associations. More useful information about association ownership was in the Doctrine manual , but I found a more succinct explanation in the answer to this question on StackOverflow . Now I understood better about associations and ownership and was able to identify exactly what sort I was using and the syntax that was required. I was implementing a uni-directional many to one relationship, which is supposedly one of the most simpl...

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it.    I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on.  A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...