Skip to main content

Working with classic ASP years after it died

I searched for "dead clown" but all the pictures were too
disturbing.  I suppose that's kind of like the experience
of trying to get classic ASP up and running with todays libraries
I'm having to work on a legacy site that runs on classic ASP.  The real challenge is trying to get the old code to run on my Ubuntu virtual machine.

There is a lot of old advice on the web and most of it was based on much older software versions, but I persevered and have finally managed to get classic ASP running on Apache 2.4 in Ubuntu.

The process will allow you to have a shot at getting your code running, but my best advice is to use a small Windows VM.  There's no guarantee that your code will actually compile and run using this solution, and the effort required is hardly worthwhile.

The Apache module you're looking for is Apache::ASP.  You will need to build it manually and be prepared to copy pieces of it to your perl include directories.  You will also need to manually edit one of the module files.

The best instructions I found for getting Apache::ASP installed were on the cspan site.  You'll find the source tarball on the cpan modules download page.

I'm assuming that you're able to install the pre-requisites and build the package by following those instructions.  I was able to use standard Ubuntu packages and didn't have to build everything from source:

 sudo apt-get install libapreq2-3 libapache2-request-perl

Once you've built and installed Apache::ASP you need to edit your apache.conf file to make sure it's loaded:

 PerlModule Apache2::ASP  
  # All *.asp files are handled by Apache2::ASP  
  <Files ~ (\.asp$)>  
   SetHandler perl-script  
   PerlHandler Apache::ASP  
  </Files>

If you try to start Apache at this point you will get an error something like Can't locate Apache2/ASP.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Apache2::ASP module)

Unfortunately the automated installs don't place the modules correctly.  I'm not a perl developer and didn't find an easy standard way to add an external path to the include path, so I just copied the modules into my existing perl include path.  You'll find the requested files in the directory where you build Apache2::ASP

The next problem that I encountered was that Apache 2.4 has a different function name to retrieve the ip of the connecting request.  You'll spot an error in your log like this : Can't locate object method "remote_ip" via package "Apache2::Connection".

The bug fix is pretty simple and is documented at cpan.  You'll need to change line 85 of StateManager.pm.  You'll find the file in the directory where you copied the modules into the perl include directory, and its location is in your error log.

 # See https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=107118  
 Change line 85:  
     $self->{remote_ip}     = $r->connection()->remote_ip();  
 To:  
     if (defined $r->useragent_ip()) {  
         $self->{remote_ip} = $r->useragent_ip();  
     } else {  
         $self->{remote_ip} = $r->connection->remote_ip();  
     }

Finally after all that my code doesn't run because of compile issues - but known good test code does work.

This is in no way satisfactory for production purposes, but does help in getting a development environment up and running.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Solving Doctrine - A new entity was found through the relationship

There are so many different problems that people have with the Doctrine error message: exception 'Doctrine\ORM\ORMInvalidArgumentException' with message 'A new entity was found through the relationship 'App\Lib\Domain\Datalayer\UnicodeLookups#lookupStatus' that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Searching through the various online sources was a bit of a nightmare.  The best documentation I found was at  http://www.krueckeberg.org/  where there were a number of clearly explained examples of various associations. More useful information about association ownership was in the Doctrine manual , but I found a more succinct explanation in the answer to this question on StackOverflow . Now I understood better about associations and ownership and was able to identify exactly what sort I was using and the syntax that was required. I was implementing a uni-directional many to one relationship, which is supposedly one of the most simpl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it.    I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on.  A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...
Post a Comment
Read more

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...
Post a Comment
Read more