Restarting BOINC automatically

Image: https://boinc.berkeley.edu, fair use

BOINC is a program curated by the University of Berkeley that allows people around the world to contribute to science projects.

It works by using spare cycles from your computer to perform calculations that help do things like folding proteins to find candidates for cancer treatment, mapping the milky way galaxy, searching for pulsar stars, and improving our understanding of climate change and its effects.

It runs as a background process and is easily configured to only run in certain conditions - like when you haven't used your computer for 10 minutes for example.

It comes with a nifty GUI manager and for most people using it on their desktop this post is not going to be at all relevant. This post deals with the case where a person is running it on a server without the GUI manager.

Anyway, the easiest solution I found to restarting BOINC on a headless server was to use supervisord. It's pretty much the "go to" tool for simple process management and adding the BOINC program was as easy as would be expected:

Here's the program definition from my /etc/supervisord.conf file:

 [program:BOINC]  
 command=sh /root/boinc/startup.sh  
 process_name=boinc  
 exitcodes=0,1,2
 autostart=true  
 autorestart=unexpected

I use a script to restart BOINC because I want to make sure that I get reconnected to my account manager in case something goes wrong.

Here's what /root/boinc/startup.sh script looks like:

 /etc/init.d/boinc-client start  
 sleep 10  
 boinccmd --join_acct_mgr http://bam.boincstats.com <user> <pass>

If BOINC crashes it will automatically get restarted and reconnected to my account manager. This means I don't need to monitor that process on all the servers I install it on.

Comments

Using Fail2Ban to protect a Varnished site from scrapers

I'm using Varnish to cache a fairly busy property site. Varnish works like a bomb for normal users and has greatly improved our page load speed. For bots that are scraping the site, presumably to add the property listings to their own site, though the cache is next to useless since the bots are sequentially trawling through the whole site. I decided to use fail2ban to block IP's who hit the site too often. The first step in doing so was to enable a disk based access log for Varnish so that fail2ban will have something to work with. This means setting up varnishncsa. Add this to your /etc/rc.local file: varnishncsa -a -w /var/log/varnish/access.log -D -P /var/run/varnishncsa.pid This starts up varnishncsa in daemon mode and appends Varnish access attempts to /var/log/varnish/access.log Now edit or create /etc/logrotate.d/varnish and make an entry to rotate this access log: /var/log/varnish/*log { create 640 http log compress ...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred. The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change. Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal. One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern". Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Separating business logic from persistence layer in Laravel

There are several reasons to separate business logic from your persistence layer. Perhaps the biggest advantage is that the parts of your application which are unique are not coupled to how data are persisted. This makes the code easier to port and maintain. I'm going to use Doctrine to replace the Eloquent ORM in Laravel. A thorough comparison of the patterns is available here . By using Doctrine I am also hoping to mitigate the risk of a major version upgrade on the underlying framework. It can be expected for the ORM to change between major versions of a framework and upgrading to a new release can be quite costly. Another advantage to this approach is to limit the access that objects have to the database. Unless a developer is aware of the business rules in place on an Eloquent model there is a chance they will mistakenly ignore them by calling the ActiveRecord save method directly. I'm not implementing the repository pattern in all its ...

Adventures in IT

Search This Blog