Creating layered images in C#

I'm currently developing a mobile site for a client. The site is the frontend for a competition that they will be running in 2010.

Part of the project specification requires the user to be able to build an image by choosing a background, foreground, and slogan. The site will then composite these images and enter the result into the competition.

In addition the site will send text messages to the users cellphone informing them of their status and (if they elect to receive it) a "word of the day"

This is probably the closest C# solution to what I was looking for:

public Image LayerImage(Image Current, Image Layer, Int32 LayerOpacity)
{
Bitmap bitmap = new Bitmap(Current);
Bitmap layer = new Bitmap(Layer);
Color pixel = new Color();

for (int x = 0; x < layer.Width; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < layer.Height; y++)
{
pixel = layer.GetPixel(x, y);
bitmap.SetPixel(x, y, Color.FromArgb(LayerOpacity, pixel));
}
}

return bitmap;
}

The PHP solution is slightly more easy:

$layers[] = imagecreatefromjpeg("images/example_background.jpg");
$layers[] = imagecreatefromgif("images/example_foreground.gif");
$layers[] = imagecreatefromgif("images/example_motto.gif");
for ($i = 0; $i < count($layers); $i++)
{
imagecopy($image, $layers[$i], 0, 0, 0, 0, 600, 550);
}
header('Content-type: image/jpeg');
imagejpeg($image);

We don't use the .PNG format when coding a .mobi website because not all handsets support this format. Similarly we cannot assume that Javascript will be supported and so we cannot rely on this as a solution. Everything must happen at the server and be sent in the most simple format to the mobile phone.

Further references

http://www.dreamincode.net/forums/showtopic53101.htm
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.drawing.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/platformsdk/sdkupdate/psdk-full.htm

Comments

Solving Doctrine - A new entity was found through the relationship

There are so many different problems that people have with the Doctrine error message: exception 'Doctrine\ORM\ORMInvalidArgumentException' with message 'A new entity was found through the relationship 'App\Lib\Domain\Datalayer\UnicodeLookups#lookupStatus' that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Searching through the various online sources was a bit of a nightmare. The best documentation I found was at http://www.krueckeberg.org/ where there were a number of clearly explained examples of various associations. More useful information about association ownership was in the Doctrine manual , but I found a more succinct explanation in the answer to this question on StackOverflow . Now I understood better about associations and ownership and was able to identify exactly what sort I was using and the syntax that was required. I was implementing a uni-directional many to one relationship, which is supposedly one of the most simpl...

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it. I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on. A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred. The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change. Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal. One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern". Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Adventures in IT

Search This Blog