Skip to main content

Prevent XSS attacks

XSS (Cross Site Scripting) is a surprisingly easy weakness to exploit on unprepared websites. To describe it at its highest level an XSS attack involves injecting code into a webpage and having a user execute it on the grounds that they trust the website you have hijacked.

There are a great many vectors for an XSS attack to come through, but for the most part applying a few simple safety precautions will greatly improve your site security.

XSS attacks can be split into one of three categories:

  1. Stored XSS attacks - are those where the attacker stores malicious code in your database, forum, comment section or elsewhere on your site. The victim receives the code when they request that particular content from your website.

  2. Reflected XSS attacks - are those where the malicious code is reflected off the server and sent to the victim as part of search results, emails, error messages, etc. This can be set up by tricking the victim into clicking a specially crafted link (or filling in a malicious form) that generates the appropriate response from the insecure server.

  3. DOM XSS attacks - are those where the payload is delivered on the client side by manipulating the script once it has been sent by the server.
It is essential for web developers to sanitize their data so that it does not open doors to these simple attacks.
Cardinal rule: Don't insert data you can't trust
Don't put received data into scripts, tags, HTML comments, attribute names, or tag names. Especially don't run Javascript that you receive.

If your language has automatic functions to sanitize strings (e.g.: PHP has filter_var) then use it.  Be cautious of using functions that are designed to work with html entities, some XSS attacks can work around this.

This applies to HTML elements, Javascript, CSS, attributes, names, and everywhere else that you use received data.

Useful XSS prevention resources

Acunetix provides a free version of their vulnerability scanner that does a good job of detecting XSS attacks.

The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) has an extensive wiki on website security.

These guys provide us with users who click on links they shouldn't. Without them we wouldn't have a job.

Trevor Sewell is a UK developer who has kindly provided a PHP XSS class that sanitizes POST data.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Solving Doctrine - A new entity was found through the relationship

There are so many different problems that people have with the Doctrine error message: exception 'Doctrine\ORM\ORMInvalidArgumentException' with message 'A new entity was found through the relationship 'App\Lib\Domain\Datalayer\UnicodeLookups#lookupStatus' that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Searching through the various online sources was a bit of a nightmare.  The best documentation I found was at  http://www.krueckeberg.org/  where there were a number of clearly explained examples of various associations. More useful information about association ownership was in the Doctrine manual , but I found a more succinct explanation in the answer to this question on StackOverflow . Now I understood better about associations and ownership and was able to identify exactly what sort I was using and the syntax that was required. I was implementing a uni-directional many to one relationship, which is supposedly one of the most simpl...

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it.    I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on.  A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...