Adding a CakePHP based virtual host in Apache 2.2

It's very simple to set up a name based virtual host in Apache 2.2 using the default Ubuntu package.

I'm assuming that you have installed Apache already and that you have edited /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default to change the AllowOverride None to something like this:

<Directory /var/www/>
                Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews
                AllowOverride All
                Order allow,deny
                allow from all
        </Directory>

If you have not already used this command

sudo a2enmod rewrite

then do so in order to enable mod_rewrite.

Now edit your /etc/hosts file and add an entry that points to the server where you are setting up the virtual host.

The line should look something like this:

192.168.0.100  mysite.local

Where the IP address points to the server where you are setting up the host and mysite.local is a nickname for the site. Remember to add the .local :)

Now create a file in /etc/apache2/sites-available and name it something that relates to the sitename (for future maintainability). I would suggest naming it the same as the sitename. Edit it and copy this basic skeleton structure into it:

<VirtualHost *:80>
        ServerAdmin webmaster@example.com
        ServerName  mysite.local
        ServerAlias mysite

        # Indexes + Directory Root.
        DirectoryIndex index.php
        DocumentRoot /var/www/mysite/
</VirtualHost>

It is important that the ServerName matches the entry you made in your /etc/hosts file.

Now run the command a2ensite mysite.local which is a Debian convenience command which creates the symbolic link from the file you created to the /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ directory.

You will need to restart Apache (service apache2 restart). If all is well you will be able to navigate to http://mysite.local on your local machine and view the site present on the server at /var/www/mysite

Comments

Solving Doctrine - A new entity was found through the relationship

There are so many different problems that people have with the Doctrine error message: exception 'Doctrine\ORM\ORMInvalidArgumentException' with message 'A new entity was found through the relationship 'App\Lib\Domain\Datalayer\UnicodeLookups#lookupStatus' that was not configured to cascade persist operations for entity: Searching through the various online sources was a bit of a nightmare. The best documentation I found was at http://www.krueckeberg.org/ where there were a number of clearly explained examples of various associations. More useful information about association ownership was in the Doctrine manual , but I found a more succinct explanation in the answer to this question on StackOverflow . Now I understood better about associations and ownership and was able to identify exactly what sort I was using and the syntax that was required. I was implementing a uni-directional many to one relationship, which is supposedly one of the most simpl...

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it. I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on. A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred. The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change. Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal. One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern". Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Adventures in IT

Search This Blog