Skip to main content

Searching in a radius with Postgres

Postgres has two very useful extensions - earthdistance and postgis.  PostGIS is much more accurate but I found earthdistance to be very easy to use and accurate enough for my purpose (finding UK postcodes within a radius of a point).

To install it first find your Postgres version and then install the appropriate package.  On my Debian Mint dev box it looks like the below snippet. My production machine is an Amazon RDS and you can skip this step in that environment.

 psql -V  
 sudo apt-get install postgresql-contrib postgresql-contrib-9.3  
 sudo service postgresql restart  

Having done that you should launch psql and run these two commands.  Make sure that you install cube first because it is a requirement of earthdistance.

 CREATE EXTENSION cube; CREATE EXTENSION earthdistance;  

Now that the extensions are installed you have access to all of the functions they provide.

If you want to check that they're working you can run SELECT earth(); as a quick way to test a function. It should return the earth's radius.

Earthdistance treats earth as a perfect sphere but Postgis is more accurate. Since I'm working in a fairly local region (less than 20 statute miles) I felt that approximating the surface as a sphere was sufficiently accurate.

I had a table of postcodes and an example query looked like this:

 SELECT * FROM postcodes  
 WHERE earth_box(ll_to_earth(-0.20728725565285000, 51.48782225571700000), 100) @> ll_to_earth(lat, lng)  

This took quite a long time (*cough* a minute *cough*) to run through the 1.7 million postcodes in my table. After a little searching I realized that I should index the calculation with the result that queries now take about 100ms, which is plenty fast enough on my dev box.

 For reference - using the Haversine formula in a query was taking around 30 seconds to process - even after constraining my query to a box before calculating radii.

 CREATE INDEX postcode_gis_index on postcodes USING gist(ll_to_earth(lat, lng));  

So now I can search for UK postcodes that are close to a point and I can do so sufficiently quickly that my user won't get bored of watching a loading spinner gif.

Comments

  1. Hey

    I am just wandering what is this 100 figure in function used in query.

    WHERE earth_box(ll_to_earth(-0.20728725565285000, 51.48782225571700000), 100) @> ll_to_earth(lat, lng)

    Is this in M, KM, Miles?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi,

    The syntax for earth_box looks like this: ... WHERE earth_box(ll_to_earth({longitude_float_value}, {latitude_float_value}), {radius_in_meters}) @> ll_to_earth(some_table.latitude, some_table.longitude)

    So the 100 is meters.

    I'd recommend trying both PostGIS and earthdistance by the way - I found that PostGIS was faster in some cases but earthdistance is good enough for most things.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using Fail2Ban to protect a Varnished site from scrapers

I'm using Varnish to cache a fairly busy property site.  Varnish works like a bomb for normal users and has greatly improved our page load speed. For bots that are scraping the site, presumably to add the property listings to their own site, though the cache is next to useless since the bots are sequentially trawling through the whole site. I decided to use fail2ban to block IP's who hit the site too often. The first step in doing so was to enable a disk based access log for Varnish so that fail2ban will have something to work with. This means setting up varnishncsa.  Add this to your /etc/rc.local file: varnishncsa -a -w /var/log/varnish/access.log -D -P /var/run/varnishncsa.pid This starts up varnishncsa in daemon mode and appends Varnish access attempts to /var/log/varnish/access.log Now edit or create /etc/logrotate.d/varnish and make an entry to rotate this access log: /var/log/varnish/*log { create 640 http log compress ...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred.  The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change.   Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal.   One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern".   Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Grokking PHP monolog context into Elastic

An indexed and searchable centralized log is one of those tools that once you've had it you'll wonder how you managed without it.    I've experienced a couple of advantages to using a central log - debugging, monitoring performance, and catching unknown problems. Debugging Debugging becomes easier because instead of poking around grepping text logs on servers you're able to use a GUI to contrast and compare values between different time ranges. A ticket will often include sparse information about the problem and observed error, but if you know more or less when a problem occurred then you can check the logs of all your systems at that time. Problem behaviour in your application can occur as a result of the services you depend on.  A database fault will produce errors in your application, for example. If you log your database errors and your application errors in the same central platform then it's much more convenient to compare behaviour between...