Connecting to Elixir web channels from the Angular 2 quickstart application

I am busy learning Elixir, a language that adds syntactic sugar to the awesomely scalable and concurrent Erlang language. The "go to" framework in Elixir is Phoenix and I'm busy writing my "hello world" application which will serve up data across a web channel.

I followed the Typescript version of the Quickstart guide for Angular 2 (here). I really like what I've seen of Typescript so far. Dependencies are easy to manage and the ability to define interfaces is a good sign of how well structured the language is. I think Satya Nadella should be made an open source hero, if such an award exists.

Anyway, what I wanted to do was get my Angular 2 application to be able to connect to the Elixir server channel and send a request to listen to a particular stream. The idea is to use the Actor concurrency model (explained brilliantly in "The Little Elixir & OTP Book") to start up a new process whenever a request for a stream arrives. This article focuses on setting up the Angular 2 connection.

The official Phoenix javascript client is packaged up and can be installed with "npm install --save phoenix". Once it's installed we need to tell SystemJS where to find it so we amend systemjs.config.js and include it in our map array.

Now we'll be able to import the Phoenix class from it wherever we need to. We'll need it in the service that we're going to use to wrap the Phoenix channel support. Lets take a look…

We import the library using the map name that we set up in our systemjs config to make it available to our class. We then copy the code that Phoenix shows on the channels manual page to actually handle the connection.

This gives us a channel service that we'll be able to inject into components.

Angular 2 uses constructor injection so we'll be passing a channel service into the constructor function. Before we do that though we need to let the component know that our channel service is a provider so that we can properly typecast the injected variable. Once all this is saved run your app with 'npm start' and if you pop over to your browser window you should see error messages in your console log saying that the channel connection was refused, unless of course you're already running your Phoenix server.

Comments

Using Fail2Ban to protect a Varnished site from scrapers

I'm using Varnish to cache a fairly busy property site. Varnish works like a bomb for normal users and has greatly improved our page load speed. For bots that are scraping the site, presumably to add the property listings to their own site, though the cache is next to useless since the bots are sequentially trawling through the whole site. I decided to use fail2ban to block IP's who hit the site too often. The first step in doing so was to enable a disk based access log for Varnish so that fail2ban will have something to work with. This means setting up varnishncsa. Add this to your /etc/rc.local file: varnishncsa -a -w /var/log/varnish/access.log -D -P /var/run/varnishncsa.pid This starts up varnishncsa in daemon mode and appends Varnish access attempts to /var/log/varnish/access.log Now edit or create /etc/logrotate.d/varnish and make an entry to rotate this access log: /var/log/varnish/*log { create 640 http log compress ...

Translating a bit of the idea behind domain driven design into code architecture

I've often participated in arguments discussions about whether thin models or thin controllers should be preferred. The wisdom of a thin controller is that if you need to test your controller in isolation then you need to stub the dependencies of your request and response. It also violates the single responsibility principal because the controller could have multiple reasons to change. Seemingly, the alternative is to settle on having fat models. This results in having domain logic right next to your persistence logic. If you ever want to change your persistence layer you're going to be in for a painful time. That's a bit of a cargo cult argument because honestly who does that, but it's also a violation of the single responsibility principal. One way to decouple your domain logic from both persistence and controller is to use the "repository pattern". Here we encapsulate domain logic into a data service. This layer deals exclusively with imple...

Separating business logic from persistence layer in Laravel

There are several reasons to separate business logic from your persistence layer. Perhaps the biggest advantage is that the parts of your application which are unique are not coupled to how data are persisted. This makes the code easier to port and maintain. I'm going to use Doctrine to replace the Eloquent ORM in Laravel. A thorough comparison of the patterns is available here . By using Doctrine I am also hoping to mitigate the risk of a major version upgrade on the underlying framework. It can be expected for the ORM to change between major versions of a framework and upgrading to a new release can be quite costly. Another advantage to this approach is to limit the access that objects have to the database. Unless a developer is aware of the business rules in place on an Eloquent model there is a chance they will mistakenly ignore them by calling the ActiveRecord save method directly. I'm not implementing the repository pattern in all its ...

Adventures in IT

Search This Blog